Ian Traynor should know better
Commenting on Sunday’s referendum victory in Croatia in favour of joining the EU, the veteran Guardian journalist Ian Traynor, a man with a long experience of covering former-Yugoslav affairs, has this to say:
Croatia has voted to join the EU by a sweeping majority, delivering a greater than expected yes vote in a referendum watched nervously in Brussels for fear of a backlash… The endorsement means that Croatia, barring any last-minute hiccups, will become the EU’s 28th member country in July next year, symbolising its break with the Balkans and former Yugoslavia and anchoring it strongly in the European mainstream as well as Nato.
How exactly does Traynor think that Croatia’s entry into the EU will ‘symbolise its break with the Balkans and former Yugoslavia’ ? Three Balkan states (Greece, Bulgaria, Romania) and one former-Yugoslav state (Slovenia) are already members of the EU, and the others are seeking to join. The likelihood is that most, if not all, will eventually succeed, and that EU membership will therefore unite Croatia firmly will the rest of the former Yugoslavia and the wider Balkans. Far from ‘symbolising its break with the Balkans and the former Yugoslavia’, Croatia’s entry into the EU will reaffirm its close relations and common destiny with them.
Traynor’s lazy sentence hints at a perceived dichotomy between ‘Europe’ and ‘the Balkans’, whereby the former represents things like law, democracy, progress and human rights and the latter represents things like primitivism, nationalism, authoritarianism and looking backwards. Joining ‘Europe’ would therefore mean abandoning the ‘Balkan’ world of primitivism, nationalism, authoritarianism and looking backwards. Traynor’s sentence hints that the nationalism and wars in the former Yugoslavia of the 1990s were a product of the region’s ‘Balkanness’; of traits inherent to it as a Balkan rather than a European region. In reality, Western and Central Europe have had, if anything, worse records of extreme nationalism, imperialism and genocide than have the Balkans.
Ian Traynor should know better.
-
Archives
- February 2012 (1)
- January 2012 (3)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (6)
- May 2011 (1)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (6)
- February 2011 (6)
-
Categories
- Abkhazia
- Afghanistan
- Albania
- Anti-Semitism
- Arabs
- Armenians
- Australia
- Balkans
- Basque Country
- BNP
- Bosnia
- Britain
- Bulgaria
- Catalonia
- Caucasus
- Central Europe
- Chechnya
- Croatia
- Cyprus
- Darfur
- Denmark
- East Timor
- Education
- Egypt
- Environment
- European Union
- Falklands
- Faroe Islands
- Fascism
- Finland
- Former Soviet Union
- Former Yugoslavia
- France
- Genocide
- Georgia
- Germany
- Greece
- Greenland
- Heathrow
- Iceland
- Immigration
- India
- Indonesia
- Iran
- Iraq
- Islam
- Israel
- Italy
- Jews
- Kosovo
- Kurds
- Libya
- London
- Macedonia
- Marko Attila Hoare
- Middle East
- Misogyny
- Moldova
- Montenegro
- NATO
- Neoconservatism
- Netherlands
- Norway
- Pakistan
- Palestine
- Political correctness
- Portugal
- Racism
- Red-Brown Alliance
- Russia
- Rwanda
- Sami
- Scandinavia
- Scotland
- Serbia
- Slovakia
- Slovenia
- South Ossetia
- Spain
- Sudan
- Svalbard
- Sweden
- SWP
- Syria
- Tasmania
- The Left
- Transnistria
- Transport
- Turkey
- Uncategorized
- Zimbabwe
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

A blog devoted to political commentary and analysis with a particular – but far from exclusive – focus on South East Europe. I come from a traditional left-wing background, but believe that the recent failure of most of the left to oppose fascism, genocide and tyranny in the former Yugoslavia, as well as in the Middle East and elsewhere, has definitely discredited left-wing politics in its traditional form. This blog will therefore, among other things, be discussing what a new progressive politics might mean in the twenty-first century.